Litigation

April 16th, 2012 Leave a comment Go to comments

Lawsuits have been filed regarding the lead, arsenic, and silicofluoride added to drinking water:

Three plaintiffs have filed suit against the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California.The suit was filed in federal court.

Read Jeff Green’s article in the Bolen Report regarding the suit.

Read the complaint in Foli vs. Metropolitan Water District of Southern California.

Read the Water District’s Motion to Dismiss the case.

Read the plaintiffs’ devastating Reply to the Water District’s Motion to Dismiss.

On April 10, 2012, the Court dismissed the case, agreeing with the Water District that the FDA Act did not create a private cause of action.

 

A Maryland woman has filed suit against Nestle and Gerber. As a child her mother gave her mostly Gerber baby water to drink and mixed formula using Gerber Baby Water. Said water contained around .8 ppm sodium fluoride, around the same fluoride level as in current tap water.

Read the complaint here.

See the Plaintiff’s s teeth here.

Read about Port Angeles litigation here.

 

 

  1. February 21st, 2012 at 04:09 | #1

    Keep us up to date on these issues!

    I read all the San Deigo stuff. HSFA can never be approved because each batch is different. The whole case can start over for each new batch. Just as with legal “Bath Salts” – which are not outlawed – and can be sold to anyone to get a “high”. The problem in out lawing these street drugs is that as soon as one formula is outlawed the street chemists go to work and change one element of the molecule and have a “new” salt that has to go through the same legal processes ot be outlawed!

  1. February 19th, 2012 at 17:32 | #1