<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>FLUORIDE CLASS ACTION &#187; Constitutional Issues</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fluoride-class-action.com/category/constitutional-issues/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fluoride-class-action.com</link>
	<description>by James Robert Deal, Attorney</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 14:24:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Montana Supreme Court upholds election spending limits</title>
		<link>http://fluoride-class-action.com/montana-supreme-court-upholds-election-spending-limits?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=montana-supreme-court-upholds-election-spending-limits</link>
		<comments>http://fluoride-class-action.com/montana-supreme-court-upholds-election-spending-limits#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 08:57:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jamesrobertdeal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Constitutional Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contribution limits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporatism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fluoride-class-action.com/?p=3392</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Montana Supreme Court upholds election spending limits The high court upholds the state&#8217;s century-old corporate contribution limits, a rebuff of the U.S. Supreme Court decision that allowed businesses to spend as freely as individuals in campaigns. January 04, 2012&#124;By Kim Murphy, Los Angeles Times Reporting from Seattle — Montana has engaged in a long, slow [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://fluoride-class-action.com/montana-supreme-court-upholds-election-spending-limits/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Protections provided by the Constitution shall apply only to natural persons unless specified otherwise</title>
		<link>http://fluoride-class-action.com/protections-provided-by-the-constitution-shall-apply-only-to-natural-persons-unless-specified-otherwise?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=protections-provided-by-the-constitution-shall-apply-only-to-natural-persons-unless-specified-otherwise</link>
		<comments>http://fluoride-class-action.com/protections-provided-by-the-constitution-shall-apply-only-to-natural-persons-unless-specified-otherwise#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Nov 2011 00:11:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jamesrobertdeal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Constitutional Issues]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fluoride-class-action.com/?p=2972</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://wh.gov/26c We petition the obama administration to: Propose an amendment to the Constitution clarifying its protections as covering natural persons unless specified. The Supreme Court has given many of the rights of people to corporations, including the right to use money as free speech. As such we ask the president to propose a Constitutional amendment [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://fluoride-class-action.com/protections-provided-by-the-constitution-shall-apply-only-to-natural-persons-unless-specified-otherwise/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Washington Constitution</title>
		<link>http://fluoride-class-action.com/washington-constitution?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=washington-constitution</link>
		<comments>http://fluoride-class-action.com/washington-constitution#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 10:29:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jamesrobertdeal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Constitutional Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Initiatives]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fluoride-class-action.com/?p=216</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In their complaint when they sued the city of Port Angeles, the Citizens claimed their rights under the Washington  Constitution were in general were being violated. They cited specifically Article 1, Sections 1, 3, and 11: ARTICLE I DECLARATION OF RIGHTS SECTION 1 POLITICAL POWER. All political power is inherent in the people, and governments [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://fluoride-class-action.com/washington-constitution/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>RAP 2.5 Rules of Appellate Procedure</title>
		<link>http://fluoride-class-action.com/rap-2-5-rules-of-appellate-procedure?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=rap-2-5-rules-of-appellate-procedure</link>
		<comments>http://fluoride-class-action.com/rap-2-5-rules-of-appellate-procedure#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 09:06:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jamesrobertdeal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Constitutional Issues]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fluoride-class-action.com/?p=186</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rule 2.5 of rules of Appellate Procedure is important to this case. The City has made a motion to strike sections of the Citizens&#8217; amicus briefs, specifically &#8220;those portions of amici&#8217;s briefs containing claims and arguments [and attachments] not presented to the trial court and to strike and not consider the attachments related to those [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://fluoride-class-action.com/rap-2-5-rules-of-appellate-procedure/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

