FLUORIDE CLASS ACTION

3-2-10

Dear Fluoride Debunkers,

This is in Today’s NY Times. It’s about Blytheville Arkansas’s water. That’s just down the road from Promised Land, where where I fell to earth.

http://projects.nytimes.com/toxic-waters/contaminants/ar/mississippi/ar0000365-blytheville-waterworks

Go here to the Environmental Working Group and sign up for their e-mails. They apparently broke this story.

Pretty amazing stuff. The truth is starting to boil over.

I talked with Matt Mosley, one of the administrators at the Blytheville Water Works. Matt says that they go through two 55-gallon drums of fluorosilicic acide each month and that after Hurricane Katrina the fluoride started coming from China. Blytheville has been fluoridated since the late 1960s, so I drank that water until I left there in 1965. Water there comes out of an aquifer that is 1,800 feet deep and which stretches from the Bootheel of Missouri down to Memphis. Whether the massive quantities of pesticides and other chemicals sprayed on crops can penetrate that deep is something I have no information on.

Let’s all make a special push to bring this issue into people’s consciousness.

If you really want to do something to fight fluoride, mail a Freedom of Information request like this one and send to your city or water works:

http://dealmortgage.net/fluoride-class-action/arkansas-fluoride-freedom-of-information-request.htm

Organize!  Send these notices out. Send copies to the mayors and city council people. Send copies to the newspaper. Find an attorney who has a conscience and ask him to sign them. Hold press conferences. Find a respected person to serve as spokesman.

Follow up as soon as they respond and send out a Notice of Potential Liability like this one:

http://dealmortgage.net/fluoride-class-action/notice-to-arkansas-of-liability-12-16-8.htm

Hold another press conference.

When your water district fails to send you an assay of raw scrubber liquor fresh from some Fluorida or Chinese phosphate fertilizer factory, send him a letter like this:

http://dealmortgage.net/fluoride-class-action/reply-to-everetts-refusal-to-do-full-assay-of-raw-fluoride-scrubber-liquor-6-29-9.pdf

If we all push simultaneously, we can accomplish something. Don’t leave it up to others. Organize your group. I would love to fly in and do an organizational seminar and rally. I would help you write up all these documents so you can get started. If you can recruit a local lawyer, I will work with him.

Conive. Plot. Conspire. “Kick at the night until it bleeds daylight.”

DO SOMETHING!

Sincerely,

James Robert Deal , Attorney, Loan Officer
James@JamesRobertDeal.com

PO Box 2276 Lynnwood WA 98036

Telephone: 425-771-1110
Fax: 425-776-8081

www.JamesRobertDeal.com

www.DealMortgage.net

www.Mortgage-Modification-Attorney.com

www.Fluoride-Class-Action.com

www.WhatToServeAGoddess.com

How Mortgage Modification Works

Save Fuel – Reduce Traffic Congestion – Improve the Environment

A Comprehensive Approach To Transit, Transportation and Land Use

Seattle Buses are Overflowing: But there is a Solution
Put the Viaduct and I-5 Together In A Tunnel Under Downtown Seattle

Oppose Water Fluoridation – Write the Governor
Deal Threatens to Sue his Home State of Arkansas over Fluoridation

Seattle Water Not Safe or Healthy – Seattle P-I Article by JRD
Tobacco Science, DDT Science, Tetraethyl Lead Science, Asbestos Science, Fluoride Science,  All Fraudulent Sciences

Medical Doctor in Tennessee Legislature Calls for Halt in Water Fluoridation

Toxicologists Warns Against Water Fluoridation

Fluoride is Very Bad for Babies – Do Not Use Tap Water to Mix With Formula

The Connection Between Diet and the Environment – My Book
Earthlings -The Movie

Swine Flue Comes From Swine

30% Off On Quality Health Care

How the Body is Tricked into Eating Junk Food

Americans are Very Fat

Chemical Analysis of Poisoning from Fluoridated Public Water
Richard D. Sauerheber, Ph.D.

Abstract. The mechanism by which fluoride from unnatural sources exerts adverse effects in man and animals is examined. Low level artificial fluoridation of municipal water can cause well known alterations in teeth and bone structure with incorporation of fluoride into a wide array of tissues and increased hip fracture tendency, depending on years of exposure and water hardness. High accidental levels cause acute lethal poisoning and are responsible for fluoride listings on poisons registries and for their major industrial use as rodenticides, insecticides or pediculicides. Solubility calculations indicate that blood fluoride concentrations required to decrease calcium below normal physiological levels compare to those present in the tissues of poisoned victims and to those causing decreased beat rates in isolated heart cells in culture. The effects of calcium ion and pH over broad ranges on the free fluoride ion concentration were determined. Acute lethal poisoning with heart attack, and also many of the chronic ‘low’ level effects of fluoride, are mediated by calcium binding by fluoride ion. At a pH typical of gastric juice, approximately 50% of fluoride is protonated as hydrofluoric acid HF, with 50% remaining the free fluoride ion. The significance of these observations is discussed in terms of potential hazards, both short and long term, associated with consumption of artificially fluoridated waters of varying calcium content.

Read the full article here:
http://fluoride-class-action.com/wp-content/uploads/sauerheber-chemical-analysis-of-poisoning-from-fluoridated-public-water.pdf

James Deal,

   I thought you also would like to have the attached graph that indicates the uselessness of ‘water fluoridation’ in its stated objective. The data are from 39 Washington State Counties, according to percentage of people in each county that has fluoridated water (blue curve). Also on the graph (red curve) are the percentage of decayed or filled tooth surfaces in 3rd grade residents of those Counties. Decay remains quite comparable in all Counties in spite of the absence or presence of wide variations in water fluoridation %. This is in agreement with the findings of Dr. Osmundson in Oregon in his all-50-states study in the U.S., also pubnlished in this book on page 68.
 
  The graph was from a book rcently donated to me from a friend. The reference is:
 
Bruce Spittle, Fluoride Fatigue (Revised 3rd printing), Paua Press, Dunedin, New Zealand, 2008,  p.69. 

http://www.pauapress.com/fluoride/files/1418.pdf
 
  Dr. Spittel is the recipient of the John Malcolm Memorial Prize in Physiology and Biochemistry. The text mainly summarizes much recent data on fluoride poisoning in man and animals from several biochemical research scientists.

Read Richard Sauheber’s article at:
http://fluoride-class-action.com/wp-content/uploads/sauerheber-chemical-analysis-of-poisoning-from-fluoridated-public-water.pdf

Read Dr. Bruce Spittle’s book here.

Double-blind clinical studies and numerous case studies demonstrate that from one to five percent of the population, are hypersensitive to fluoride to varying degrees, and these people can experience incapacitating symptoms that can drive them to move away from cities with fluoridated water.

Dr. Bruce Spittle, M.D., Fluoride Poisoning: Is fluoride in your drinking water—and from other sources—making you sick? 2008, ISBN 978-0-473-12991-0, which can be downloaded from http://www.pauapress.com/fluoride/files/1418.pdf.

The Washington Supreme Court stated in 1954 that if city water is fluoridated, it will be necessary for residents “to use it for domestic purposes including drinking, because there is no other practical source of supply.” Kaul v Chehalis, 45 Wn.2d 616, 277 P.2d 352 (1954) at 618. Some people cannot afford a distiller or a whole house filter. Some are not strong enough to haul water jugs home. Some do not own a vehicle. Some cannot afford to buy water.

http://fluoride-class-action.com/wp-content/uploads/appendix-b-bruce-spittle-fluoride-fatigue.pdf

The Port Angeles fluoridation case was heard by the Washington Supreme court on February 23, 2010.

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2011171932_apwascowmountvernon.html?syndication=rss

Fluoride and Kidneys

Fluoride plays perhaps more mischief with the kidneys than with any other organ.

See this excellent summary of the literature by Carol Clinch.

http://fluoride-class-action.com/wp-content/uploads/carol-clinch-2009-fluoride-and-kidneys.pdf

In 1986 the EPA greatly reduced the amount of lead allowable in water pipes, plumbing solder, and brass fittings.

However, lead is still allowed in all of these provided notice is given.

See: http://fluoride-class-action.com/wp-content/uploads/epa-1988-lead-solder-ban-except-with-disclosure.pdf.

I WANT TO WRITE A RESPONSE TO THIS INACURATE PRO-FOUORIDE BRIEF. I NEED YOUR HELP

http://fluoride-class-action.com/wp-content/uploads/answer-to-brief-of-nine-amici-from-dental-serv-found-of-wa-and-dental-ass-water-and-fluoride-sci-committee.pdf

It is riddled with errors, and I need to point them out.

Please help me pick it apart. I have some good stuff about kidney disease and lead. I need something about how bad arsenic, any arsenic, is bad.

It is best to find authoiries in the 2006 NRC Report, because its credibility is very high. Or any article by one of the Twelve who wrote the 2006 NRC Report. Instant credibility, and that means judicial notice. The Court can take judicial notice of clear scientific principles at any point, even on appeal. 

The Washington Dental Service Foundation (WDSF), Washington State Dental Association (WSDA), and Water Fluoridation Science Committee (WFSC) filed an answer to the IAOMT Brief. It includes page after page of scientific arguments, issues, and scientific documents not presented to the Trial Court, including fluoridation endorsements from numerous agencies, and a lengthy article entitled “Water Fluoridation and the Environment,” by Howard F. Pollick. If the opposition is bringing forward scientific information, then the Nine Amici should be allowed to do so as well.

I must add that the above Answer written by WDSF, WSDA, and WFSC is riddled with illogical and unscientific statements regarding lead and kidney disease. 

Regarding lead:

To illustrate: The Brief acknowledges that almost half of tanker loads of scrubber liquor contain a little arsenic and a little lead. They say there is already some arsenic and some lead in the water coming from other sources, so it is acceptable to add a little more. Fluoride dissolves pretty much everything, including lead. New pipes, fittings, and solders contain lead, and old ones contain up to 30% lead. Lead solder for use in plumbing was not outlawed until 1986, so this might explain why lead continues to show up in water fountains in old Seattle schools, at levels up to 1,600 ppb, 80 times the EPA MCL of 20 ppb. See Appendix D attached, “Lead-Tainted Water in Seattle Schools Stuns Parents,” Or click on http://www.seattlepi.com/health/180495_leadwater02.html.

I am looking for the article that says that lead levels are generally higher in children who drink fluoridated water.

Regarding kidney disease this is what I would say:

Even a healthy kidney can only excrete 50% of fluoride consumed, so it accumulates in us all and in the kidney. A weakened kidney stores fluoride it cannot excrete, furthering the downward death spiral. 2006 NRC Report page 140.

See summary of scientific literature done by Carol Clinch, “Fluoride and Kidneys,”which cites to page 140 of the 2006 NCR Report.
http://fluoride-class-action.com/wp-content/uploads/carol-clinch-2009-fluoride-and-kidneys.pdf

Carol Clinch, “Fluoride and Kidneys,” cites to page 140 of the 2006 NCR Report, which says:

In patients with reduced renal function, the potential for fluoride accumulation in the skeleton is increased. It has been known for many years that people with renal insufficiency have elevated plasma fluoride concentrations compared with normal healthy persons and are at a higher risk of developing skeletal fluorosis.” National Research Council. (2006).Fluoride in Drinking Water: A Scientific Review of EPA’s Standards. National Academies Press, Washington D.C. p140.

Carol, why don’t you write a draft brief on this subject?

I have been told that lead levels are higher in the systems of kids that drink fluoridated water. II would like to present an amicus brief on that subject.

See the Clinch article:

http://fluoride-class-action.com/wp-content/uploads/carol-clinch-2009-fluoride-and-kidneys.pdf

Read the poor response to the IAOMT Brief here:

http://fluoride-class-action.com/wp-content/uploads/answer-to-brief-of-nine-amici-by-city-of-port-angeles.pdf

Almost every sentence of this document is wrong or misleading or based on incorrect assumptions. That’s why I want to write a new brief reviewing the quality of the writing in that brief.

Read my IAOMT Brief here. All the Appendices are here too:

http://www.box.net/shared/iedafn1jr7

Read the City’s motion to strike the IAOMT Brief here:

http://fluoride-class-action.com/wp-content/uploads/citys-motion-to-strike-citizens-briefs-1-29-10.pdf

Read my defense of the IAOMT Brief here:

http://fluoride-class-action.com/wp-content/uploads/response-of-nine-amici-to-motion-to-strike-iaomt-brief-2-19-10-final.pdf

So write your own draft brief. It does not have to be long. It is best if it covers just one subject. Or just send me articles with paragraphs that introduce them. That constitutes a brief. It is never to late to introduce scientific arguments into a legal-scientific case. Why? because science is a form of law. It falls within the category of “natural law.” It is analagous to a dictionary. It is never too late for a judge to look up a word in the dictionary, or a concept in the encyclopedia, or to take judicial notice of convincing science.

The weekend is here, so spend it writing!

The writer of the poor brief says on page 5 that at the low levels of concentration, fluoride is a water additive, not a drug. I need to rebut that.

I am also looking for an attorney who can sign the man briefs that are starting to come in. The Supreme Court has a sort of quota on how many briefs one attorney can write.

So use my format on previous briefs and put your content into it.

Come on guys, the Supreme Court hearing is on Tuesday the 23rd. I would like to hand deliver a stack of new amicus briefs. Actually, I think that we can submit briefs after the hearing.

This is the final reply of the Nine Amici to the City’s motion to strike it. Use it as your template. Send me an e-mail, and I will send it to you in word so you can edit it easier.

THE LATEST NEWS:

Tuesday, February 17, Noon

Please read the final version of my defense against having our brief stuck.  

Click hear to read the February 5, 2010, IAOMT brief, including all Appendices such as D-1 through D-103.

Click here to read Appendices A, B, C, and D.

Please send me journal articles about the harms. I need articles about how fluoride accumulates, about how it affects the kidney especially when it is failing and initiatives a death spiral, about penetration of the brain barrier, placental barrier, and mammary barrier. Quantities of fluoride consummed by diabetics and sweaty athletes, sweaty workers, and sweaty soldiers. 

Send me these articles ASAP. Please write an introduction to the article and briefly summarize it. In the introduction say what you believe about fluoridation and how it might be affecting the health of your family. The title for your introduction is: “Amicus Brief.” 

That’s right. Write your own “Amicus Brief.” I will give you the wording on this web page within 24 hours. The Court WILL look at this, and it WILL go into the record.

We should use this case as a rallying point for our movement. We have momentum, and we should build it into more momentum.

All across the country we should be sending Freedom of Information Act requests for documents. Click here for a sample.

We should follow it up with an explanation of what the water district is doing wrong and a Notice of Potential liability and Not to Destroy Documents.

Remember, we can win this thing, and the time is NOW!! (I rarely use exclamation points. I’m trying to stir you to action. STIR!!

Yes, they have all the money. But we have all the good ideas.

Start writing and sending me those Amicus Briefs.

And here is another alternative: There are now Nine Amici on the IAOMT Brief. Feel free to join the IAOMT brief. Pretty soon it will be the Fifty Amici. Send a description of your interest in the issue. If you are part of a group, talk about the group’s interest in the issue. You can form an on-the-spot group. This is a good time to be forming de-fluoridation groups.

I also need attorneys who are willing to sign briefs. The Supreme Court is not likely to allow me to submit more briefs under my own name.

Just send me the briefs, and I will connect the briefs up with the lawyers, who may want to revise the briefs with their own insights.

The hearing is February 23 up in Skagit County, so hurry up!

Remember, we can win this thing, and the time is NOW!! (I rarely use exclamation points. I’m trying to stir you to action. STIR!!

Yes, they have all the money. But we have all the good ideas.

Start writing and sending me those Amicus Briefs.

Just send me the briefs, and I will connect the briefs up with the lawyers, who may want to revise the briefs with their own insights.